The present French Tax Update will focus on an overview of several noteworthy French tax court decisions issued during the past few months, in particular in relation with VAT, the 3 percent tax on distributed income, and some long-awaited corporation tax disputes. APPLICATION OF VAT RULES TO TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN HEAD OFFICE AND PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT For French corporation tax purposes, a French permanent establishment (PE) of a non-French tax resident corporation is treated as a separate taxable person including, generally, in its dealings with its head office. International tax treaties, signed by France, define how income and expenses (including those borne by the head offices for the purposes of the PE) should be allocated to the PE. For VAT purposes, the French case law generally considers that the "transactions" between a head office and its PE are not within the scope of the tax (i.e., because they take place within the same legal entity). The French tax authorities (FTA) generally follow the same approach. The European Union case law (FCE Bank, September 23, 2006) arrives at the same conclusion when the PE lacks autonomy vis-à-vis the head office. There is, also, one recent EU law case (Skandia, September 17, 2014) where it was decided that if the head office or the PE belongs to a "VAT group", then the internal dealings between the head office and the PE should be treated as in scope (NB: France has not introduced the VAT grouping in its legislation). Also, in a separate EU law case (Crédit Lyonnais, September 12, 2013), the concept of a worldwide pro-rata (i.e., a computation of the aggregate VATable activities of the head office and its PEs) was rejected. In a decision dated January 27, 2015, the Administrative Appeal Court of Versailles (Appeal Court) deals with the situation of a French PE (of a UK law-governed entity) with two separate activities: financial transactions with French clients where the PE has elected to be liable to VAT, and services provided to the UK head office regarding certain "equity and fixed income sales". The PE had decided to deduct the full VAT charged to it on its own expenses, whether the expenses were borne for the clients' activities or for the dealings with the head office. The FTA had challenged the position of the PE by taking the view that the expenses borne exclusively for the dealings with the head office may not, in principle, result in a deductible VAT, although the FTA had accepted to take into account the pro-rata of the head office (i.e., the percentage of its VATable transactions) as a reference for the VAT deduction of the PE regarding the dealings with the head office. As for the mixed expenses of the PE (i.e., borne for both clients' activities and head office's dealings), the FTA had taken the view that the related VAT was partially deductible, again based on the head office's pro-rata corrected by the VATable turnover of the PE. The bank had appealed after losing at the administrative tribunal level. The Appeal Court starts its reasoning by referring to the FCE Bank case law and the related conclusion that the dealings between a head office and a PE should be disregarded in the absence of autonomy of the PE. Thus, the Appeal Court observes that since the taxpayer does not argue for the autonomy of the PE vis-à-vis the UK head office, the amounts received from the latter (i.e., as remuneration for the equity and fixed income sales) may not be treated as in scope, and...
French Tax Update - Recent Noteworthy French Tax Court Decisions
|Author:||Mr Siamak Mostafavi, Nicolas André and Alexios Theologitis|
To continue readingREQUEST YOUR TRIAL
- Mondaq France
- Arbitration In France: The 2011 Reform
- New Arbitration Law In France: The Decree Of January 13, 2011
- French Court Supports Freedom Of Authentication: A Win For Art Experts
- Does French Law Recognise A Duty To Mitigate?
- French Tax Update - Noteworthy Tax Courts Decisions And Draft Macron Law
- French Supreme Administrative Court Decision Significantly Broadens Scope Of The French Sunshine Act
- Toward Class Actions For Health-Related Claims In France
- French Tax Update - Recent Noteworthy French Tax Court Decisions
- Debt-Push-Down Challenged Under Abuse Of Law Theory
- Dividend Withholding Tax Exemption And Specific Anti-Abuse Provision
- Advocate General Opines In ECJ Case Targeting Dividend Withholding Tax
- Macron Law Modifies French Insolvency Law
- French Tax Update - French Finance Bills
- French Tax Update - Recent Case Law And Other Noteworthy Publications
- Legal Revolution In France Civil Law Reforms (Or Napoleon's Second Coming)
- French Data Protection Wants To Force Google To Extend The Right To Be Delisted To All The Search Engine's Extensions
- Article In Bloomberg BNA: The Right To Be Forgotten Protection Or Hegemony?
- Entering Into Force On 1 July 2016, The French Draft Law On Health Class Actions' Will Bring With It More Complexity And Legal Uncertainty
- Mediate Or Lose Your Claim. A Salutary Reminder For Claimants In French Court And Arbitration Proceedings
- Foreign Discovery Under 28 US Code Section 1782 In French Proceedings
- A Tale Of Dirty Deals, Demurrage And Discontent: Enforcement Of Arbitral Award Refused
- Pre-Contractual Negotiations A New Codified French Regime
- Wildenstein Art Dynasty Heirs Acquitted Of Tax Fraud
- Again The Life Science Industry Will Have To Take A Close Look At A New Set Of Regulations Reshaping Transparency-Related Obligations
- Paris Court Of Appeal Potentially Increases Scope Of The Doctrine Of 'Adverse Inferences'
- Consortium De Réalisation Prevails In Final Chapter In Tapie Dispute
- Third-Party Funding The French Perspective
- Who Wins, Where And Why? Paris, France
- The International Chamber Of The Paris Court Of Appeal Will Become Operational On March 1st, 2018
- The International Chambers Of The Paris Courts And Their Innovative Rules Of Procedure
- Renewed Interest In French Class Actions?
- About The Importance Of Implementing The BDES (Economic And Social Data Base)!
- Violation Of The 'Anti-Kickback' Statute: The French Supreme Court Upholds The 2017 Decision Of The Paris Court Of Appeal Imposing Record Fines
- Preventing The Enforcement Of A First Demand Guarantee Within A Few Weeks' Time: Story Of A Successful Case
- The National Assembly Proposes Picking Bercy's Lock
- Conditions Governing The Admissibility Of A Motion To Dismiss Based On Estoppel
- Gaillard's Chaos Theory
- Return Of Artworks To Africa: A Legal Conundrum
- The Launch Of The Prague Rules: Useful Or Unnecessary Tool For International Arbitration?
- Article 145 Of The French Civil Procedure Code Constitutes An Effective Weapon, Provided You Know How To Wield It
- Investment Arbitration Under The Energy Charter Treaty
- 2018-2022 French Programming Act For Justice: Inching Towards Virtual Justice?
- Les 7 articles les plus consultés et partagés sur le site August Debouzy
- Anxiety From Asbestos Exposure: French Compensation Model Extended To Other Toxic Substances
- WIPO Becomes First Non-Chinese Entity To Administer .CN Domain Name Disputes
- Astrid Mignon Colombet Joins August Debouzy As Partner
- Expanding Involvement Of Courts In Arbitration Makes Sense
- Proving Corruption In Investment Arbitration Lao Holdings v. The Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Secrecy Of Pre-Trial Investigations And Inquiries: A Fundamental Principal Undermined By Social Changes